Talk:Arthur Morgan/@comment-38054084-20190127165248

This article is terrible. "Boring main protagonist" No one cares about the authors opinion. We want the facts. The math is incredibly terrible. Arthur is 35 not 56. He wasn't presumably born in 1843, and 11 years later is 1854, not in the 1860's when Arthur was actually born. I'm genuinely in shock on how terrible this article is.